<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 202 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53634</link>
    <description>Shrimp seeds in the post-larva stage, being unfit for human consumption on the facts, were treated as outside Chapter 3 and not excisable in the relevant condition, so the duty demand on those clearances failed. The Tribunal also distinguished job-work clearances made for other exporters from the appellant&#039;s own alleged DTA clearances and found no convincing evidence of suppression; as a result, extended limitation, interest and penalties could not be sustained. The absence of Development Commissioner permission did not, by itself, validate a duty demand where no excisable liability otherwise survived.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 202 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53634</link>
      <description>Shrimp seeds in the post-larva stage, being unfit for human consumption on the facts, were treated as outside Chapter 3 and not excisable in the relevant condition, so the duty demand on those clearances failed. The Tribunal also distinguished job-work clearances made for other exporters from the appellant&#039;s own alleged DTA clearances and found no convincing evidence of suppression; as a result, extended limitation, interest and penalties could not be sustained. The absence of Development Commissioner permission did not, by itself, validate a duty demand where no excisable liability otherwise survived.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>