<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 266 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53631</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal concluded that the export goods, despite being overvalued for DEPB benefits, were not liable for confiscation under Section 113 of the Customs Act, 1962, as they were not prohibited. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, dispensed with the pre-deposit, and allowed the appeals, determining no penalties were imposable on the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 266 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53631</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal concluded that the export goods, despite being overvalued for DEPB benefits, were not liable for confiscation under Section 113 of the Customs Act, 1962, as they were not prohibited. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, dispensed with the pre-deposit, and allowed the appeals, determining no penalties were imposable on the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>