<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 347 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798321</link>
    <description>GST appellate remedy before the Tribunal was available within the prescribed filing window, subject to the statutory pre-deposit. The challenge to invocation of Section 74 was left for determination by the Tribunal rather than addressed in writ proceedings. The writ petition was disposed of with the petitioner directed to pursue the appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 08:44:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 347 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798321</link>
      <description>GST appellate remedy before the Tribunal was available within the prescribed filing window, subject to the statutory pre-deposit. The challenge to invocation of Section 74 was left for determination by the Tribunal rather than addressed in writ proceedings. The writ petition was disposed of with the petitioner directed to pursue the appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>