<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 348 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798322</link>
    <description>Subsequent service-tax adjudication and garnishee recovery for a period already covered by an appellate determination could not stand. Works performed exclusively for Government Departments were treated as exempt under Notification No. 25/2012-S.T., and the services also fell within the small-scale service-provider exemption under Notification No. 33/2012-S.T. The earlier appellate determination found no taxable service, return-filing liability, sustainable demand, or late fee, and resulted in refund of the deposited amount. Reliance on income-tax returns and Form 26AS could not support a later demand for the same period. The subsequent order-in-original and recovery notice were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 08:44:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 348 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798322</link>
      <description>Subsequent service-tax adjudication and garnishee recovery for a period already covered by an appellate determination could not stand. Works performed exclusively for Government Departments were treated as exempt under Notification No. 25/2012-S.T., and the services also fell within the small-scale service-provider exemption under Notification No. 33/2012-S.T. The earlier appellate determination found no taxable service, return-filing liability, sustainable demand, or late fee, and resulted in refund of the deposited amount. Reliance on income-tax returns and Form 26AS could not support a later demand for the same period. The subsequent order-in-original and recovery notice were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>