https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798337 Reliance on unverified AI-generated material falsely presented as judicial precedent undermines the integrity of customs adjudication. AI may assist research but cannot replace an adjudicating officer's responsibility to independently verify any authority before relying on it. Customs penalty orders founded on non-existent, falsely cited, or hallucinated AI-generated precedents are unsustainable. Such matters require fresh adjudication by a different officer of equivalent rank. en-us Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Sep 2026 08:44:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798337 Reliance on unverified AI-generated material falsely presented as judicial precedent undermines the integrity of customs adjudication. AI may assist research but cannot replace an adjudicating officer's responsibility to independently verify any authority before relying on it. Customs penalty orders founded on non-existent, falsely cited, or hallucinated AI-generated precedents are unsustainable. Such matters require fresh adjudication by a different officer of equivalent rank. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798337