<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 364 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798338</link>
    <description>Maintainability of writ jurisdiction despite an available statutory appeal arose from an order requiring a bank guarantee for provisional release of imported goods. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition without interfering with the impugned order or judgment. The provisional-release direction, including its bank-guarantee condition, consequently remained undisturbed. No further legal reasoning on the alternative statutory remedy or writ maintainability is specified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 364 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798338</link>
      <description>Maintainability of writ jurisdiction despite an available statutory appeal arose from an order requiring a bank guarantee for provisional release of imported goods. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition without interfering with the impugned order or judgment. The provisional-release direction, including its bank-guarantee condition, consequently remained undisturbed. No further legal reasoning on the alternative statutory remedy or writ maintainability is specified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>