<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 383 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798357</link>
    <description>Section 119(2)(b) permits admission of delayed income-tax refund claims where relief is required to avoid genuine hardship, without prescribing a limitation period. The six-year restriction in Circular No. 9/2015 cannot curtail that statutory discretion, although departmental circulars bind income-tax authorities. Refund-condonation applications rejected solely for exceeding that period require fresh consideration on merits, including in constitutional writ proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 08:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 383 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798357</link>
      <description>Section 119(2)(b) permits admission of delayed income-tax refund claims where relief is required to avoid genuine hardship, without prescribing a limitation period. The six-year restriction in Circular No. 9/2015 cannot curtail that statutory discretion, although departmental circulars bind income-tax authorities. Refund-condonation applications rejected solely for exceeding that period require fresh consideration on merits, including in constitutional writ proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>