<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 392 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798366</link>
    <description>Reopening proceedings raised the issue whether reasons to believe rested on borrowed satisfaction or the assessing authority&#039;s independent satisfaction, concerning expense disallowances for purchases treated as bogus. The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP after condoning delay, finding no ground to interfere with the High Court judgment and order. The challenge to the reopening and related disallowances therefore did not proceed further before the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 08:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 392 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798366</link>
      <description>Reopening proceedings raised the issue whether reasons to believe rested on borrowed satisfaction or the assessing authority&#039;s independent satisfaction, concerning expense disallowances for purchases treated as bogus. The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP after condoning delay, finding no ground to interfere with the High Court judgment and order. The challenge to the reopening and related disallowances therefore did not proceed further before the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>