<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 394 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798368</link>
    <description>Section 107(8) requires a personal hearing before a statutory appeal is dismissed as time-barred where a delay-condonation application is pending. Dismissing the appeal without hearing the applicant on the reasons for delay breaches the mandatory hearing requirement and denies an opportunity to explain the delay. Such dismissal is legally unsustainable, requiring the delay-condonation request to be considered after affording a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 08:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 394 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798368</link>
      <description>Section 107(8) requires a personal hearing before a statutory appeal is dismissed as time-barred where a delay-condonation application is pending. Dismissing the appeal without hearing the applicant on the reasons for delay breaches the mandatory hearing requirement and denies an opportunity to explain the delay. Such dismissal is legally unsustainable, requiring the delay-condonation request to be considered after affording a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>