<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 193 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the Revenue did not meet the burden of proof to establish that the confiscated goods were smuggled. Consequently, the confiscation of the goods and the Maruti Van was deemed unjustified. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, entitling the appellants to the return of the Mahazar value of the goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 193 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the Revenue did not meet the burden of proof to establish that the confiscated goods were smuggled. Consequently, the confiscation of the goods and the Maruti Van was deemed unjustified. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, entitling the appellants to the return of the Mahazar value of the goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>