<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Prima facie satisfaction and not conclusive proof of fraud is sufficient to invoke Section 74 of the CGST Act</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17348</link>
    <description>Section 74 of the CGST Act may be invoked where the Proper Officer forms a prima facie, rational view from available material that tax short-payment, erroneous refund, or wrongful input tax credit is attributable to fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts. Materials from scrutiny, audit, inspection, intelligence, or investigation may support that view, provided the statutory satisfaction remains that of the Proper Officer. Where the fraud-based allegations are not established during adjudication, Section 75(2) permits determination as though the notice had been issued under Section 73, without retrospective invalidation of the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:25:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:25:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Prima facie satisfaction and not conclusive proof of fraud is sufficient to invoke Section 74 of the CGST Act</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17348</link>
      <description>Section 74 of the CGST Act may be invoked where the Proper Officer forms a prima facie, rational view from available material that tax short-payment, erroneous refund, or wrongful input tax credit is attributable to fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts. Materials from scrutiny, audit, inspection, intelligence, or investigation may support that view, provided the statutory satisfaction remains that of the Proper Officer. Where the fraud-based allegations are not established during adjudication, Section 75(2) permits determination as though the notice had been issued under Section 73, without retrospective invalidation of the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:25:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>