https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53619 The Tribunal set aside demands related to alleged clandestine removal of goods, finding insufficient evidence of actual manufacturing or financial transactions. Private diaries were deemed inconclusive evidence, especially when contradictory statements and lack of corroborative evidence existed. The appellants' explanations regarding fabricated documents led to the demands being dismissed. The impugned order was overturned, and the appeal was allowed based on the absence of substantial evidence supporting the allegations. en-us Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:45:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53619 The Tribunal set aside demands related to alleged clandestine removal of goods, finding insufficient evidence of actual manufacturing or financial transactions. Private diaries were deemed inconclusive evidence, especially when contradictory statements and lack of corroborative evidence existed. The appellants' explanations regarding fabricated documents led to the demands being dismissed. The impugned order was overturned, and the appeal was allowed based on the absence of substantial evidence supporting the allegations. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53619