<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 314 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798288</link>
    <description>Ex parte assessment and appellate orders require a proper opportunity for the assessee to present supporting evidence and explanations. Where the assessee alleges defective service of notices and shows that replies were filed during assessment proceedings, adjudication should proceed on merits only after a final hearing opportunity. The matter was restored to the jurisdictional assessing authority for fresh adjudication after affording that opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:24:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 314 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798288</link>
      <description>Ex parte assessment and appellate orders require a proper opportunity for the assessee to present supporting evidence and explanations. Where the assessee alleges defective service of notices and shows that replies were filed during assessment proceedings, adjudication should proceed on merits only after a final hearing opportunity. The matter was restored to the jurisdictional assessing authority for fresh adjudication after affording that opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>