<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 332 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798306</link>
    <description>Challenge to a GST demand order in Form GST DRC-07 raised alleged statutory and natural-justice violations. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy on making the prescribed pre-deposit and filing an application to condone delay. The appellate authority may assess whether delay should be condoned and, if satisfied, determine the appeal on its merits in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:24:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 332 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798306</link>
      <description>Challenge to a GST demand order in Form GST DRC-07 raised alleged statutory and natural-justice violations. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy on making the prescribed pre-deposit and filing an application to condone delay. The appellate authority may assess whether delay should be condoned and, if satisfied, determine the appeal on its merits in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>