<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 335 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798309</link>
    <description>Challenge to an assessment order despite an available appellate remedy was addressed through writ jurisdiction. The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal, subject to the prescribed pre-deposit and an application for condonation of delay. Coercive recovery under the garnishee notice was stayed for the period permitted to file the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:24:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 335 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798309</link>
      <description>Challenge to an assessment order despite an available appellate remedy was addressed through writ jurisdiction. The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal, subject to the prescribed pre-deposit and an application for condonation of delay. Coercive recovery under the garnishee notice was stayed for the period permitted to file the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>