<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103422</link>
    <description>Political contribution deductions supported by banking payment and a receipt from a registered unrecognised political party cannot be disallowed merely on general search material suggesting that the recipient operated a cash-back arrangement. Such material may warrant inquiry, but cash repayment to a particular donor requires assessee-specific evidence establishing a transactional nexus. Search presumptions do not establish cash receipt by a person from whose possession or control the material was not found, particularly where third-party material is not supplied and cross-examination is unavailable. An unexplained-money addition also requires proof that the assessee owned unrecorded money; inferred cash receipt based on alleged commission, without foundational evidence, is conjectural.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:24:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:24:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103422</link>
      <description>Political contribution deductions supported by banking payment and a receipt from a registered unrecognised political party cannot be disallowed merely on general search material suggesting that the recipient operated a cash-back arrangement. Such material may warrant inquiry, but cash repayment to a particular donor requires assessee-specific evidence establishing a transactional nexus. Search presumptions do not establish cash receipt by a person from whose possession or control the material was not found, particularly where third-party material is not supplied and cross-examination is unavailable. An unexplained-money addition also requires proof that the assessee owned unrecorded money; inferred cash receipt based on alleged commission, without foundational evidence, is conjectural.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:24:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>