https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471476 Suppression of material facts can bar discretionary relief under Article 226 where petitioners challenge auction proceedings while withholding binding Supreme Court directions. The petitioners knew that the Enforcement Directorate had been permitted to attach and auction the properties in accordance with law and that the auction was to continue uninterrupted. Their failure to disclose those directions, which could affect the grant of relief, constituted deliberate suppression and conflicted with the Supreme Court's directions. The challenge to the auction proceedings was therefore not entitled to discretionary writ relief. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Sep 2026 18:41:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471476 Suppression of material facts can bar discretionary relief under Article 226 where petitioners challenge auction proceedings while withholding binding Supreme Court directions. The petitioners knew that the Enforcement Directorate had been permitted to attach and auction the properties in accordance with law and that the auction was to continue uninterrupted. Their failure to disclose those directions, which could affect the grant of relief, constituted deliberate suppression and conflicted with the Supreme Court's directions. The challenge to the auction proceedings was therefore not entitled to discretionary writ relief. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471476