<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2000 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471477</link>
    <description>Rejection of books of account requires identified defects in the accounting method, entries, or supporting records; non-receipt of third-party information alone is insufficient where relevant financial and transactional records are produced. Estimated gross-profit additions require a rational evidentiary basis, such as comparable cases, industry standards, or material showing income suppression, particularly where declared margins are consistent with prior years. Cash deposits recorded in the cash book and explained by earlier withdrawals cannot be treated as unexplained money without adverse evidence disproving their source. Suspicion does not replace evidence, and consistency in corresponding transactions remains relevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 18:41:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2000 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471477</link>
      <description>Rejection of books of account requires identified defects in the accounting method, entries, or supporting records; non-receipt of third-party information alone is insufficient where relevant financial and transactional records are produced. Estimated gross-profit additions require a rational evidentiary basis, such as comparable cases, industry standards, or material showing income suppression, particularly where declared margins are consistent with prior years. Cash deposits recorded in the cash book and explained by earlier withdrawals cannot be treated as unexplained money without adverse evidence disproving their source. Suspicion does not replace evidence, and consistency in corresponding transactions remains relevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>