<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2319 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471475</link>
    <description>Reassessment notices issued beyond three years require the alleged escaped income to meet the prescribed monetary threshold for extended limitation. Where the recorded escaped income for Assessment Year 2017-18 was below Rs. 50 lakh, the extended period was unavailable. The notice issued under Section 148 was therefore invalid, and the consequential reassessment could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 18:27:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2319 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471475</link>
      <description>Reassessment notices issued beyond three years require the alleged escaped income to meet the prescribed monetary threshold for extended limitation. Where the recorded escaped income for Assessment Year 2017-18 was below Rs. 50 lakh, the extended period was unavailable. The notice issued under Section 148 was therefore invalid, and the consequential reassessment could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>