https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471466 Recovery of a disallowance arising from alleged non-deduction of tax at source should remain deferred where the related demand for the same assessment year has already been stayed pending statutory appeals after the stipulated deposit. Because the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) arose from the same underlying issue, recovery should not proceed until the appeals are decided. The merits of the tax liability and the depositors' claimed exemption remain unadjudicated. The statutory appeals should be disposed of expeditiously, preferably within three months. en-us Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Sep 2026 13:57:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471466 Recovery of a disallowance arising from alleged non-deduction of tax at source should remain deferred where the related demand for the same assessment year has already been stayed pending statutory appeals after the stipulated deposit. Because the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) arose from the same underlying issue, recovery should not proceed until the appeals are decided. The merits of the tax liability and the depositors' claimed exemption remain unadjudicated. The statutory appeals should be disposed of expeditiously, preferably within three months. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471466