<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 164 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Central Excise can authorize either the adjudicating authority or any other authorized officer to file an appeal under Section 35E(2) of the Central Excise Act. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, and the case was remanded for further consideration on the merits by the Commissioner (Appeals). This interpretation aims to ensure a harmonious application of Section 35E, preventing anomalies and fulfilling the legislative intent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:53:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 164 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Central Excise can authorize either the adjudicating authority or any other authorized officer to file an appeal under Section 35E(2) of the Central Excise Act. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, and the case was remanded for further consideration on the merits by the Commissioner (Appeals). This interpretation aims to ensure a harmonious application of Section 35E, preventing anomalies and fulfilling the legislative intent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>