<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 204 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798178</link>
    <description>Correction of the record was confined to entering counsel&#039;s appearance for Respondent No. 2. Reliance on a cited decision concerning photocopies was not material because the earlier dismissal rested on an undisputed default and the default record filed with the Information Utility under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appearance entry was directed to be corrected, while the request for further speaking-to-the-minutes changes was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 204 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798178</link>
      <description>Correction of the record was confined to entering counsel&#039;s appearance for Respondent No. 2. Reliance on a cited decision concerning photocopies was not material because the earlier dismissal rested on an undisputed default and the default record filed with the Information Utility under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appearance entry was directed to be corrected, while the request for further speaking-to-the-minutes changes was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>