https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798190 Writ jurisdiction against a customs confiscation order should ordinarily not be exercised where an efficacious statutory appellate remedy is available and the challenge involves disputed facts. Questions concerning the recording and voluntariness of statements, service or waiver of notice and hearing, and compliance with confiscation procedures require appraisal of the adjudication record by the appellate authority. A bare allegation of breach of natural justice does not, on these facts, justify bypassing that remedy. The petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal. en-us Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:20:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798190 Writ jurisdiction against a customs confiscation order should ordinarily not be exercised where an efficacious statutory appellate remedy is available and the challenge involves disputed facts. Questions concerning the recording and voluntariness of statements, service or waiver of notice and hearing, and compliance with confiscation procedures require appraisal of the adjudication record by the appellate authority. A bare allegation of breach of natural justice does not, on these facts, justify bypassing that remedy. The petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798190