<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 193 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53581</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals, granting relief to the appellants. It upheld the classification of goods as Modular Furniture, confirming the applicability of the exemption under Notification No. 140/91-Cus. The duty demands and penalties were deemed time-barred, and confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act was unjustified. The Tribunal criticized the Customs authority&#039;s interpretation, emphasizing the practicality of importing Modular Furniture in different consignments. Consequently, the appellants were entitled to the exemption, and the Department&#039;s actions were found procedurally and substantively flawed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 193 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53581</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals, granting relief to the appellants. It upheld the classification of goods as Modular Furniture, confirming the applicability of the exemption under Notification No. 140/91-Cus. The duty demands and penalties were deemed time-barred, and confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act was unjustified. The Tribunal criticized the Customs authority&#039;s interpretation, emphasizing the practicality of importing Modular Furniture in different consignments. Consequently, the appellants were entitled to the exemption, and the Department&#039;s actions were found procedurally and substantively flawed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>