<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>AIFTA dispute resolution cannot bar customs recovery proceedings where treaty mechanisms remain unincorporated into municipal law.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103360</link>
    <description>Article 24 of the ASEAN-India Free Trade Area, which provides an inter-State consultation mechanism, does not displace Customs Authorities&#039; statutory jurisdiction unless incorporated into municipal law. The Rules of Origin implement origin criteria but do not incorporate that dispute-resolution mechanism, so it cannot be privately enforced to bar Customs Act proceedings. Customs recovery powers for incorrect preferential-duty claims existed under the unamended provisions governing short levy, short payment and truthful bill-of-entry declarations. Origin-certificate particulars supporting preferential treatment form part of those declarations. The later certificate-of-origin verification regime added a specific procedure without creating or limiting the pre-existing general recovery power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:20:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:20:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>AIFTA dispute resolution cannot bar customs recovery proceedings where treaty mechanisms remain unincorporated into municipal law.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103360</link>
      <description>Article 24 of the ASEAN-India Free Trade Area, which provides an inter-State consultation mechanism, does not displace Customs Authorities&#039; statutory jurisdiction unless incorporated into municipal law. The Rules of Origin implement origin criteria but do not incorporate that dispute-resolution mechanism, so it cannot be privately enforced to bar Customs Act proceedings. Customs recovery powers for incorrect preferential-duty claims existed under the unamended provisions governing short levy, short payment and truthful bill-of-entry declarations. Origin-certificate particulars supporting preferential treatment form part of those declarations. The later certificate-of-origin verification regime added a specific procedure without creating or limiting the pre-existing general recovery power.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:20:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>