<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Arbitration clauses do not bar insolvency proceedings where supply-related debt and default exist without a genuine pre-existing dispute.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103356</link>
    <description>Arbitration clauses do not bar an operational creditor from pursuing the statutory insolvency remedy, even where arbitration is available or has been initiated, provided debt and default are established. A settlement amount arising from disputes connected with the supply of raw cotton constitutes operational debt because it is a claim in respect of goods; the claimant is therefore an operational creditor. A damages claim raised only in reply to the demand notice, without prior genuine adjudicatory or arbitral pursuit and supported only by limited correspondence, is not a pre-existing dispute. The rejection of the operational debt application was quashed, and admission and further proceedings were directed in accordance with law, including moratorium.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:20:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:20:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Arbitration clauses do not bar insolvency proceedings where supply-related debt and default exist without a genuine pre-existing dispute.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103356</link>
      <description>Arbitration clauses do not bar an operational creditor from pursuing the statutory insolvency remedy, even where arbitration is available or has been initiated, provided debt and default are established. A settlement amount arising from disputes connected with the supply of raw cotton constitutes operational debt because it is a claim in respect of goods; the claimant is therefore an operational creditor. A damages claim raised only in reply to the demand notice, without prior genuine adjudicatory or arbitral pursuit and supported only by limited correspondence, is not a pre-existing dispute. The rejection of the operational debt application was quashed, and admission and further proceedings were directed in accordance with law, including moratorium.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:20:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>