<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Timely service-tax adjudication: unexplained delay beyond the statutory framework can invalidate orders despite an available appeal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103352</link>
    <description>Section 73(4B)(b) requires service-tax adjudication, where possible, within one year when the extended period is invoked. The qualification permits only a reasonable and legally justifiable departure, not an unrestricted power to keep a show-cause notice pending for an inordinate period. Where the notice material enabled adjudication and no adequate explanation existed, representations or claimed adjournments could not justify prolonged delay. Unexplained delay rendered the adjudication arbitrary, contrary to Section 73(4B)(b) and Article 14, leading to quashing of the service-tax order. Availability of a statutory appeal did not bar writ jurisdiction because the challenge raised a legal question and involved arbitrary adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:20:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:20:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Timely service-tax adjudication: unexplained delay beyond the statutory framework can invalidate orders despite an available appeal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103352</link>
      <description>Section 73(4B)(b) requires service-tax adjudication, where possible, within one year when the extended period is invoked. The qualification permits only a reasonable and legally justifiable departure, not an unrestricted power to keep a show-cause notice pending for an inordinate period. Where the notice material enabled adjudication and no adequate explanation existed, representations or claimed adjournments could not justify prolonged delay. Unexplained delay rendered the adjudication arbitrary, contrary to Section 73(4B)(b) and Article 14, leading to quashing of the service-tax order. Availability of a statutory appeal did not bar writ jurisdiction because the challenge raised a legal question and involved arbitrary adjudication.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:20:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>