<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1979 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471423</link>
    <description>Deposits assessed as unexplained money required fresh adjudication because the assessee had not responded to assessment notices or supplied relevant details to the Assessing Officer or appellate authority. Adequate opportunity to explain the nature and source of the deposits, and to present defences, was considered necessary in the interest of justice. All issues concerning the deposits were restored to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration after providing an adequate hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 13:54:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1979 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471423</link>
      <description>Deposits assessed as unexplained money required fresh adjudication because the assessee had not responded to assessment notices or supplied relevant details to the Assessing Officer or appellate authority. Adequate opportunity to explain the nature and source of the deposits, and to present defences, was considered necessary in the interest of justice. All issues concerning the deposits were restored to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration after providing an adequate hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>