<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 93 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798067</link>
    <description>PMLA attachment may extend to property of equivalent value where directly derived proceeds of crime are unavailable, siphoned off or untraceable, including assets acquired before the alleged criminal activity. An insurance policy remained attachable because later premiums were paid from funds intermingled with and layered through alleged proceeds of crime; money laundering was treated as a continuing offence. Attachment is not limited to property previously quantified as proceeds of crime or to persons accused in the predicate offence, where another person holds or is involved with such proceeds. An inadvertent reference to an unrelated company did not undermine reasons to believe where other material supported the funds&#039; nexus. Discharge of a co-accused based on personal lack of knowledge did not determine another person&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 08:30:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 93 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798067</link>
      <description>PMLA attachment may extend to property of equivalent value where directly derived proceeds of crime are unavailable, siphoned off or untraceable, including assets acquired before the alleged criminal activity. An insurance policy remained attachable because later premiums were paid from funds intermingled with and layered through alleged proceeds of crime; money laundering was treated as a continuing offence. Attachment is not limited to property previously quantified as proceeds of crime or to persons accused in the predicate offence, where another person holds or is involved with such proceeds. An inadvertent reference to an unrelated company did not undermine reasons to believe where other material supported the funds&#039; nexus. Discharge of a co-accused based on personal lack of knowledge did not determine another person&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>