<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 108 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798082</link>
    <description>Secondment of employees to an Indian subsidiary does not create a fixed place permanent establishment where the secondees work solely under the subsidiary&#039;s direction, control and supervision, and the foreign enterprise lacks control, liability or rights over the subsidiary&#039;s assets or personnel. Under the India-Japan treaty, a dependent agent permanent establishment requires proof that the subsidiary habitually concludes contracts, maintains delivery stock, or secures orders for the foreign enterprise. Separate risk-bearing operations and principal-to-principal offshore purchases, despite corporate and operational links, do not demonstrate the required economic, functional or legal dependence. In those circumstances, offshore supply profits are not attributable to a permanent establishment in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 08:30:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 108 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798082</link>
      <description>Secondment of employees to an Indian subsidiary does not create a fixed place permanent establishment where the secondees work solely under the subsidiary&#039;s direction, control and supervision, and the foreign enterprise lacks control, liability or rights over the subsidiary&#039;s assets or personnel. Under the India-Japan treaty, a dependent agent permanent establishment requires proof that the subsidiary habitually concludes contracts, maintains delivery stock, or secures orders for the foreign enterprise. Separate risk-bearing operations and principal-to-principal offshore purchases, despite corporate and operational links, do not demonstrate the required economic, functional or legal dependence. In those circumstances, offshore supply profits are not attributable to a permanent establishment in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>