<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 117 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798091</link>
    <description>Interest on borrowed capital is not disallowable under Section 36(1)(iii) merely because an interest-free advance is made to a family member where the taxpayer&#039;s own funds exceed that advance. An established connection between borrowed funds and the non-business advance is necessary, particularly where the overdraft was obtained for business purposes in earlier years. In the absence of evidence showing such nexus or proximity, the interest disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 08:30:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 117 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798091</link>
      <description>Interest on borrowed capital is not disallowable under Section 36(1)(iii) merely because an interest-free advance is made to a family member where the taxpayer&#039;s own funds exceed that advance. An established connection between borrowed funds and the non-business advance is necessary, particularly where the overdraft was obtained for business purposes in earlier years. In the absence of evidence showing such nexus or proximity, the interest disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>