<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 144 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798118</link>
    <description>Classification of a co-operative bank&#039;s deposits as unsecured loans was challenged because the assessment entry conflicted with the balance-sheet treatment. The assessment order was quashed to enable the taxpayer to receive an opportunity before the assessing authority. The merits of whether the deposits could properly be treated as unsecured loans were left open, and revenue authorities may issue notice and conduct fresh proceedings in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 08:30:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 144 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798118</link>
      <description>Classification of a co-operative bank&#039;s deposits as unsecured loans was challenged because the assessment entry conflicted with the balance-sheet treatment. The assessment order was quashed to enable the taxpayer to receive an opportunity before the assessing authority. The merits of whether the deposits could properly be treated as unsecured loans were left open, and revenue authorities may issue notice and conduct fresh proceedings in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>