<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 148 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798122</link>
    <description>Royalty treatment under a DTAA was raised in relation to payments for computer software supplied under a non-exclusive, non-transferable licence. The issue concerned whether such arrangements confer copyright rights, particularly a right to reproduce the software, or merely permit use of off-the-shelf or shrink-wrapped software. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed because similar Special Leave Petitions had been dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 08:30:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 148 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798122</link>
      <description>Royalty treatment under a DTAA was raised in relation to payments for computer software supplied under a non-exclusive, non-transferable licence. The issue concerned whether such arrangements confer copyright rights, particularly a right to reproduce the software, or merely permit use of off-the-shelf or shrink-wrapped software. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed because similar Special Leave Petitions had been dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>