<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 150 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798124</link>
    <description>Penalty under sections 271D and 271E requires the concerned Assessing Officer to record satisfaction during reassessment proceedings before initiating penalty action. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition both for delay and on merits, thereby confirming the High Court&#039;s order on this requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 08:30:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 150 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798124</link>
      <description>Penalty under sections 271D and 271E requires the concerned Assessing Officer to record satisfaction during reassessment proceedings before initiating penalty action. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition both for delay and on merits, thereby confirming the High Court&#039;s order on this requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>