<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 155 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798129</link>
    <description>Contradictory auto-populated input tax credit figures and annual-return disclosures require examination by the adjudicating authority before an assessment is sustained. Where an asserted technical or clerical discrepancy creates a prima facie inconsistency in ITC records, the affected taxpayer must receive an opportunity of hearing in accordance with principles of natural justice. Fresh adjudication is required to reconcile the differing figures and issue a reasoned assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 08:30:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 155 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798129</link>
      <description>Contradictory auto-populated input tax credit figures and annual-return disclosures require examination by the adjudicating authority before an assessment is sustained. Where an asserted technical or clerical discrepancy creates a prima facie inconsistency in ITC records, the affected taxpayer must receive an opportunity of hearing in accordance with principles of natural justice. Fresh adjudication is required to reconcile the differing figures and issue a reasoned assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>