<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 161 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798135</link>
    <description>GST demand proceedings confirmed after non-filing of a reply to the show-cause notice and rejection of the statutory appeal on limitation require a meaningful opportunity for the assessee to respond where bona fide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause are asserted. The assessee may submit a reply, documents and supporting material and receive a reasonable hearing before fresh adjudication, subject to payment of costs. This approach prioritises procedural fairness in contesting the GST demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 08:30:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 161 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798135</link>
      <description>GST demand proceedings confirmed after non-filing of a reply to the show-cause notice and rejection of the statutory appeal on limitation require a meaningful opportunity for the assessee to respond where bona fide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause are asserted. The assessee may submit a reply, documents and supporting material and receive a reasonable hearing before fresh adjudication, subject to payment of costs. This approach prioritises procedural fairness in contesting the GST demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>