<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 163 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798137</link>
    <description>Penalty adjudication founded on third-party statements requires a meaningful opportunity to cross-examine the persons whose statements are relied upon when the taxable person specifically requests it. Denial of that opportunity prevents an effective rebuttal of the evidentiary material and breaches principles of natural justice. Where the penalty rests on such statements, the adjudication is vitiated by the denial of requested cross-examination, operating in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 09:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 163 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798137</link>
      <description>Penalty adjudication founded on third-party statements requires a meaningful opportunity to cross-examine the persons whose statements are relied upon when the taxable person specifically requests it. Denial of that opportunity prevents an effective rebuttal of the evidentiary material and breaches principles of natural justice. Where the penalty rests on such statements, the adjudication is vitiated by the denial of requested cross-examination, operating in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=798137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>