https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471385 Section 100 confines second-appellate review to substantial questions of law, while permitting interference with factual findings founded on inadmissible material, disregard of material evidence, misconstruction of documents, or perversity. Reliance on an unproved photocopy to infer authority to alienate property raises a legal question because it is not legally admissible evidence. A notarised photocopy cannot establish a power of attorney unless the original's existence and execution, a recognised basis for non-production, and the copy's authenticity are proved before secondary evidence is admitted. Without that foundation, no presumption of due execution applies and conveyances based on the alleged authority do not bind the affected party. en-us Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Sep 2026 19:02:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471385 Section 100 confines second-appellate review to substantial questions of law, while permitting interference with factual findings founded on inadmissible material, disregard of material evidence, misconstruction of documents, or perversity. Reliance on an unproved photocopy to infer authority to alienate property raises a legal question because it is not legally admissible evidence. A notarised photocopy cannot establish a power of attorney unless the original's existence and execution, a recognised basis for non-production, and the copy's authenticity are proved before secondary evidence is admitted. Without that foundation, no presumption of due execution applies and conveyances based on the alleged authority do not bind the affected party. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471385