https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53543 The Bench dismissed the application seeking restoration of an appeal, as the applicant, though claiming to be a Director, lacked the authority to represent the company in legal proceedings. The Board resolution appointing the applicant as an Additional Director did not grant him specific authorization for legal representation, and there was no evidence of re-induction after the initial appointment. Consequently, the applicant was found to lack locus standi, leading to the dismissal of the application. en-us Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:58:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53543 The Bench dismissed the application seeking restoration of an appeal, as the applicant, though claiming to be a Director, lacked the authority to represent the company in legal proceedings. The Board resolution appointing the applicant as an Additional Director did not grant him specific authorization for legal representation, and there was no evidence of re-induction after the initial appointment. Consequently, the applicant was found to lack locus standi, leading to the dismissal of the application. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53543