<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1975 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471403</link>
    <description>Addition for alleged undervaluation of imported paper cup machines under Section 69 could not be sustained after CESTAT set aside the customs valuation finding underlying it. No appeal was filed against the CESTAT order concerning the assessee, while the customs appeal involving comparable imports was non-maintainable. With no independent evidence of undervaluation beyond customs information that no longer supported the allegation, deletion of the Section 69 addition was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 19:02:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1975 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471403</link>
      <description>Addition for alleged undervaluation of imported paper cup machines under Section 69 could not be sustained after CESTAT set aside the customs valuation finding underlying it. No appeal was filed against the CESTAT order concerning the assessee, while the customs appeal involving comparable imports was non-maintainable. With no independent evidence of undervaluation beyond customs information that no longer supported the allegation, deletion of the Section 69 addition was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>