<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1332 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471414</link>
    <description>Pending revision applications require expeditious determination where prolonged inaction continues. A revision application pending since March 2016 must be decided in accordance with law within two months after production of the certified order, with the assessee afforded an opportunity of hearing. The direction concerns timely disposal of the revision proceeding and does not determine the merits of the underlying tax claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 19:02:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1332 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471414</link>
      <description>Pending revision applications require expeditious determination where prolonged inaction continues. A revision application pending since March 2016 must be decided in accordance with law within two months after production of the certified order, with the assessee afforded an opportunity of hearing. The direction concerns timely disposal of the revision proceeding and does not determine the merits of the underlying tax claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>