<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 659 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471383</link>
    <description>Statutory canteen workers engaged through a contractor fall within the Factories Act definition of &quot;worker&quot; for that Act&#039;s purposes, but this status alone does not create an employer-employee relationship with the establishment. Absorption or regularisation depends on the actual employment arrangement, including control over appointment, wages, statutory contributions, records and discipline. Where the contractor retains these responsibilities, workers need not be continued when contractors change, and the establishment neither reimburses wages nor exercises appointment or disciplinary powers, the contractor is not merely the establishment&#039;s agent. The workers therefore have no entitlement to absorption or regularisation as regular employees of the establishment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 17:44:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 659 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471383</link>
      <description>Statutory canteen workers engaged through a contractor fall within the Factories Act definition of &quot;worker&quot; for that Act&#039;s purposes, but this status alone does not create an employer-employee relationship with the establishment. Absorption or regularisation depends on the actual employment arrangement, including control over appointment, wages, statutory contributions, records and discipline. Where the contractor retains these responsibilities, workers need not be continued when contractors change, and the establishment neither reimburses wages nor exercises appointment or disciplinary powers, the contractor is not merely the establishment&#039;s agent. The workers therefore have no entitlement to absorption or regularisation as regular employees of the establishment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>