<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1853 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471382</link>
    <description>Cash deposits during the demonetisation period were satisfactorily explained where they were covered by the recorded cash balance of a consistently disclosed money-lending business. The cash book reflected sufficient opening and available cash balances, and the deposit was recorded in the books of account. These contemporaneous accounting records supported the source of the deposit, resulting in deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 17:43:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1853 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471382</link>
      <description>Cash deposits during the demonetisation period were satisfactorily explained where they were covered by the recorded cash balance of a consistently disclosed money-lending business. The cash book reflected sufficient opening and available cash balances, and the deposit was recorded in the books of account. These contemporaneous accounting records supported the source of the deposit, resulting in deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>