<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1718 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471375</link>
    <description>A stay of operation leaves a coordinate-bench ruling in existence but makes it inoperative while the stay continues. Accordingly, a direction to constitute an arbitral tribunal could not be followed where the ruling containing that direction had been stayed. The question whether arbitration could proceed against an expelled defaulting trading member remained pending before the Supreme Court, so determination of the petition was deferred and the issue was left to be governed by the Supreme Court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 14:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1718 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471375</link>
      <description>A stay of operation leaves a coordinate-bench ruling in existence but makes it inoperative while the stay continues. Accordingly, a direction to constitute an arbitral tribunal could not be followed where the ruling containing that direction had been stayed. The question whether arbitration could proceed against an expelled defaulting trading member remained pending before the Supreme Court, so determination of the petition was deferred and the issue was left to be governed by the Supreme Court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>