<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 166 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53536</link>
    <description>Websol panels manufactured at a contractually specified construction site and used only in that construction qualified for the site-based exemption under Notification No. 59/90-C.E., because the term &quot;site&quot; was not confined to a narrow physical location. The panels were concrete structures cast for use only at the specified project, had no use elsewhere, and lacked commercial marketability. On that basis, they were not excisable, and the duty demand was correctly dropped.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:29:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 166 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53536</link>
      <description>Websol panels manufactured at a contractually specified construction site and used only in that construction qualified for the site-based exemption under Notification No. 59/90-C.E., because the term &quot;site&quot; was not confined to a narrow physical location. The panels were concrete structures cast for use only at the specified project, had no use elsewhere, and lacked commercial marketability. On that basis, they were not excisable, and the duty demand was correctly dropped.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>