https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74561 Personal insolvency proceedings were reopened before a five-member special bench after a split view on a repayment plan. As no majority view existed, including that of the third member, no final order was in force and the repayment-plan determination could not be acted upon. Notices were issued to all parties, including dissenting creditors, and the guarantor was restrained from directly or indirectly alienating property pending further consideration. Dissenting creditors also challenged the repayment-plan determination before the appellate tribunal. en-us Tue, 01 Sep 2026 11:46:04 +0530 Tue, 01 Sep 2026 11:46:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74561 Personal insolvency proceedings were reopened before a five-member special bench after a split view on a repayment plan. As no majority view existed, including that of the third member, no final order was in force and the repayment-plan determination could not be acted upon. Notices were issued to all parties, including dissenting creditors, and the guarantor was restrained from directly or indirectly alienating property pending further consideration. Dissenting creditors also challenged the repayment-plan determination before the appellate tribunal. News - Tue, 01 Sep 2026 11:46:04 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=74561