<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1911 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471368</link>
    <description>Proclamation proceedings do not impose an absolute statutory bar on anticipatory bail; the circumstances behind the proclamation, the nature of the offence, and the applicant&#039;s conduct remain material to discretionary relief. In money-laundering matters, the twin bail conditions apply to anticipatory bail. Prima facie material showing conscious involvement with proceeds of crime, including corroborated financial and documentary evidence, may defeat pre-arrest protection where the applicant cannot show reasonable grounds of non-guilt and a low risk of further offending. Persistent evasion of lawful investigative directions, the statutory presumption relating to proceeds of crime, and the gravity of economic offences weigh against relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 11:26:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1911 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471368</link>
      <description>Proclamation proceedings do not impose an absolute statutory bar on anticipatory bail; the circumstances behind the proclamation, the nature of the offence, and the applicant&#039;s conduct remain material to discretionary relief. In money-laundering matters, the twin bail conditions apply to anticipatory bail. Prima facie material showing conscious involvement with proceeds of crime, including corroborated financial and documentary evidence, may defeat pre-arrest protection where the applicant cannot show reasonable grounds of non-guilt and a low risk of further offending. Persistent evasion of lawful investigative directions, the statutory presumption relating to proceeds of crime, and the gravity of economic offences weigh against relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>