<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 257 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53534</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a customs case involving the interpretation of an entry for assessment of imported goods and valuation issues. The Tribunal held that the imported goods fell within the relevant entry despite the Commissioner&#039;s objections. Additionally, the Tribunal found the valuation based on transaction value to be valid and dismissed the Commissioner&#039;s claims of undervaluation. As a result, confiscation and penalty under the Customs Act were not justified, leading to the appeal being allowed and the impugned orders set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:24:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 257 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53534</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a customs case involving the interpretation of an entry for assessment of imported goods and valuation issues. The Tribunal held that the imported goods fell within the relevant entry despite the Commissioner&#039;s objections. Additionally, the Tribunal found the valuation based on transaction value to be valid and dismissed the Commissioner&#039;s claims of undervaluation. As a result, confiscation and penalty under the Customs Act were not justified, leading to the appeal being allowed and the impugned orders set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>