<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>TOLERANCE OR RELAXARION NOT CLAIMED IN ITR, NOT ALLOWED IN INTIMATION BY CPC, AND REVISION BY CIT U.S. 264 ALLOWED BY HIGH COURT IN W.P. BY WAY OF REMAND BUT DENIED BY SC - needs reconsideration.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17326</link>
    <description>Section 264 revision cannot be used after expiry of the revised-return period to introduce a tolerance benefit omitted from a self-assessed return processed under section 143(1). The competing issue is whether binding appellate precedent requiring a tolerance benefit must be followed by revenue authorities, including in revisionary proceedings and intimation processing. The analysis questions whether revisionary correction remains available where self-assessed income exceeds tax legally payable and whether subsequent legal developments or clarificatory tolerance amendments warrant consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>TOLERANCE OR RELAXARION NOT CLAIMED IN ITR, NOT ALLOWED IN INTIMATION BY CPC, AND REVISION BY CIT U.S. 264 ALLOWED BY HIGH COURT IN W.P. BY WAY OF REMAND BUT DENIED BY SC - needs reconsideration.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17326</link>
      <description>Section 264 revision cannot be used after expiry of the revised-return period to introduce a tolerance benefit omitted from a self-assessed return processed under section 143(1). The competing issue is whether binding appellate precedent requiring a tolerance benefit must be followed by revenue authorities, including in revisionary proceedings and intimation processing. The analysis questions whether revisionary correction remains available where self-assessed income exceeds tax legally payable and whether subsequent legal developments or clarificatory tolerance amendments warrant consideration.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>