<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797975</link>
    <description>Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires specific averments before a company director can face vicarious criminal liability for cheque dishonour. The complaint must show that, when the offence occurred, the director was in charge of and responsible for the company&#039;s business, or that the offence resulted from the director&#039;s consent, connivance or neglect. Directorship alone does not create deemed liability. General allegations against all accused, without particulars of the director&#039;s day-to-day role or involvement in the cheque transactions, are insufficient; nor can process be sustained without addressing these statutory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=920096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797975</link>
      <description>Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires specific averments before a company director can face vicarious criminal liability for cheque dishonour. The complaint must show that, when the offence occurred, the director was in charge of and responsible for the company&#039;s business, or that the offence resulted from the director&#039;s consent, connivance or neglect. Directorship alone does not create deemed liability. General allegations against all accused, without particulars of the director&#039;s day-to-day role or involvement in the cheque transactions, are insufficient; nor can process be sustained without addressing these statutory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>